On the emotional aspect of Socialism.

I am against socialism for many reasons, but one of the greatest is the emotional aspect on which it encompasses. The entire concept of taking that WHICH DOES NOT BELONG TO THOSE TAKING IT and giving it to those who feel they need it, rather than letting that person get it through charity, can work only in a world where nearly everyone agrees with this. The fact is that as human beings we have the tendancy to be very possessive, so there's inevitably someone with enough influence that will be affected that there will be a revolution. If you want proof, look at history. Every system has collapsed, more or less, because the emotional aspect of it was far too taxing, and people did not like what was happenening emotionally. You hear this mainly in the form of opression- a word that has been so overused that it now has little meaning to most. But the truth is, opression on a people can be absolutely devastating to both the economy and people of that country. Opression in general has been proven over history's word to be a generally bad thing, where people make motions against the government. Also, history has shown that people generally do not like to be controlled by government too heavily, and it's fairly obvious why, because emotionally speaking, opression and control by the government most times leads to eventual revolution. This is why emotionally speaking, the taking of people's possessions in general, which is the premise of most socialism, makes people emotionally hateful and in the minds of most people, cannot work. If you really need further proof of how corrupted socialist governments become hellholes, just look at the healthcare system of the UK, or the governmental state of France, where there are almost daily riots. My point will remain- that a socialist government emotionally cannot work.